Epic Systems Technical Assessment: 30 Practice Questions

We may earn a commission from some links on this page. Recommendations remain editorially independent.

Epic Systems recruits for different technical, implementation, project, support and software-related roles. The hiring stages and assessments can vary according to the position and recruitment cycle.

Epic’s public careers information and the instructions sent to an applicant control the real process. There is no single public official assessment blueprint that should be applied to every Epic role.

Independent candidate and preparation resources commonly discuss combinations of analytical reasoning, quantitative reasoning, logic, technical problem solving, programming or pseudocode, reading comprehension and work-style questions. Treat those descriptions as role-dependent preparation guidance rather than one universal Epic examination specification.

The 30 exercises below are original educational questions. They are not official Epic Systems, hiring-platform or JobTestPrep items. They do not reproduce confidential interview questions, proprietary source code, customer data, patient information or a live assessment interface.

For additional timed practice after you review the official invitation and format notes below, Review JobTestPrep’s US Epic Systems technical assessment preparation.

JobTestPrep is an independent third-party preparation provider. It is not Epic Systems, the hiring employer or an official assessment administrator. Confirm that the live product matches the role and assessment named in your invitation. Verify the current USD price, access period and included modules before purchase.

Epic Systems roles and assessment variation

Epic Systems is a major healthcare software company. Candidates researching Epic hiring often encounter role families such as software development, technical services, implementation, project management, support, quality assurance, data or analytics work and other technical or customer-facing paths. Job titles, locations and hiring cycles change. The assessment mix can change with them.

A software-focused path may emphasize logic, quantitative reasoning and technical problem solving. An implementation or project path may place more weight on reading instructions, analyzing scenarios, coordinating priorities and communicating clearly under incomplete information. A support-oriented path may emphasize careful triage, documentation habits and consistent judgment. Those patterns are useful study planning ideas. They are not proof that every applicant in a given family receives the same form.

Practical consequences for preparation:

• Read the job posting for skills language, required experience and process steps.
• Treat the assessment name and instructions in your invitation as the controlling source.
• Prepare transferable reasoning skills rather than memorizing a claimed universal Epic syllabus.
• Do not assume that a programming or pseudocode screen applies to every technical title.

For employer-controlled career and application information, start with the official Epic Systems careers site. For broader occupational context across computing and IT roles, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes an overview of computer and information technology occupations. Those pages explain employer and labor-market context. They do not publish a confidential Epic assessment item bank.

For broader employer-screen context, see the employer assessment tests hub. If your invitation names SHL rather than an Epic-specific screen, use the SHL assessment test guide.

What is officially confirmed

Careful candidates keep a clear boundary between what Epic publishes, what an invitation states and what independent preparation sites describe.

What candidates can treat as a practical baseline:

• Epic publishes career and hiring information on its public careers site. That site is the starting point for open roles and process expectations that Epic chooses to disclose.
• Applicants receive role-specific communications that can name assessments, interviews, timelines and next steps.
• Healthcare software work often involves careful attention to detail, clear documentation, structured problem solving and respect for privacy rules. Those workplace realities help explain why employers screen for analytical and professional habits. They do not define one fixed public test blueprint.

What is not confirmed here as a universal official Epic rule:

• that every Epic candidate takes the same assessment;
• that every technical role includes a programming or pseudocode test;
• that one fixed public duration, section list or question count applies to every administration;
• that any third-party practice pack reproduces official Epic items, scoring or a live hiring interface;
• that one ideal personality profile always wins work-style or interview evaluation.

If a detail is missing from both Epic’s public pages and your invitation, do not invent it. Prefer qualified language and confirm live rules on the day of your assessment.

What third-party sources commonly describe

Independent candidate forums, blogs and commercial preparation providers often describe Epic technical hiring screens as combining several skill families:

• quantitative reasoning, including rates, percentages, ratios and multi-step arithmetic;
• logical deduction from stated rules;
• technical or pseudocode reasoning, such as tracing variables, loops, conditions and basic data structures;
• data interpretation from tables or short charts;
• reading comprehension and instruction following;
• work-style or preference items about collaboration, clarification, reporting and planning.

Those descriptions are useful for organizing practice. They remain third-party summaries. Different roles, vendors and recruitment cycles can use different products or different configurations of similar skills. A practice pack labeled for Epic technical preparation may help you rehearse transferable question types. It does not prove that your invitation will match that pack section by section.

How to use third-party guidance without overclaiming:

1. Extract skill families, not hard numbers, when official counts are unpublished.
2. Prefer timed practice that matches the skills named in your invitation.
3. Keep notes on what your invitation actually says about calculator rules, review rights, timing and identity checks.
4. Treat commercial product pages as descriptions of their own content, not as Epic’s official syllabus.

Quantitative reasoning

Quantitative items in technical hiring screens usually test whether you can extract a clean calculation from a short workplace-style stem. The underlying math is often elementary. The challenge is accuracy under time pressure and careful reading of what the question asks for.

High-value practice clusters:

• rates and per-day or per-server averages;
• percentage increase and percentage decrease;
• ratios and part-whole relationships;
• totals with overlap or double-counting adjustments;
• simple multi-step arithmetic without unnecessary algebra.

Study method that transfers well:

1. Restate the ask in one short phrase before computing.
2. Identify the base value for any percentage question.
3. Convert ratios into one-part values before scaling.
4. Estimate a sensible range, then compute exactly.
5. Check units and whether the answer should be a count, a percentage or a duration.

Common traps include dividing by the wrong base in percentage decrease items, treating overlapping project phases as a simple sum and confusing “resolved” with “total” in ratio stems. The quantitative exercises later on this page rehearse those patterns with original wording.

Logical reasoning

Logical items ask you to apply stated premises without importing outside assumptions. In Epic-style preparation contexts, that often looks like validation rules, logging rules, exclusive activation conditions or event ordering.

Useful habits:

• Separate “must be true,” “could be true” and “cannot be true.”
• Watch for universal language such as all, every, exactly one and none.
• Use contrapositive thinking when a rule says “if X, then Y.”
• Avoid filling gaps with real-world guesses that the stem does not authorize.

Example pattern families:

• All A are B; some C are A; therefore some C are B.
• If a warning appears, an event is logged; no log exists; therefore no warning appeared under that rule.
• Exactly one of two modules is active; one is inactive; therefore the other is active.
• Ordering constraints that force one event before another even when other relationships remain open.

Logical practice rewards disciplined reading more than memorized vocabulary. If two conclusions both feel plausible, return to the premises and ask which conclusion is forced.

Technical and pseudocode reasoning

Some technical hiring screens ask candidates to trace short pseudocode, reason about conditions or recognize basic structures such as queues and stacks. That does not mean every Epic technical role includes a coding interview or a language-specific exam. Follow the invitation. When technical reasoning appears, the educational goal is usually clarity, not obscure language trivia.

Core skills worth drilling:

• variable assignment and update order;
• simple loops and accumulators;
• even/odd or threshold filters;
• logical AND and OR conditions;
• FIFO versus LIFO structure choice;
• counting matches in a list;
• operation counts across iterations;
• off-by-one boundary mistakes;
• empty-field validation logic.

How to practice efficiently:

• Trace each line on paper or in a short note instead of guessing from the final look of the snippet.
• For loops, write the running total after every iteration until the habit is automatic.
• For data structures, state the removal order in one sentence before choosing an option.
• For validation items, translate the business rule into a measurable condition such as length equals zero.

Do not confuse educational pseudocode with proprietary Epic source code, customer configuration or confidential interview prompts. The exercises on this page are original training items only.

Data interpretation

Data interpretation questions present a compact table or chart and ask for a comparison, difference, percentage or total. In hiring screens, the numbers are usually small enough to compute by hand. The risk is misreading the column labels or answering a nearby but different question.

Preparation checklist:

• Confirm which column answers the question.
• For unresolved counts, subtract resolved from requests when that relationship is defined.
• For percentages, divide the part by the whole named in the stem.
• For multi-month totals, add only the requested measure.
• Recheck whether the question asks for highest absolute value or highest rate.

The table used in questions 21 to 24 on this page is a short educational example. Live assessments may use different layouts, labels or time windows. The transferable skill is careful extraction, not memorizing this sample.

Reading and instruction following

Reading items in technical hiring often look simple. They still catch candidates who answer from general knowledge instead of from the passage. Strong performance means staying inside the text.

Useful approach:

1. Read the full passage once for the main purpose.
2. Underline or mentally mark the reason, constraint or sequence stated in the text.
3. Eliminate options that contradict the passage or invent goals the text never states.
4. Prefer the option that restates the stated purpose in plainer language.

Question 25 on this page is a short educational reading item about staged rollout. The correct choice tracks the passage’s stated reason for starting with a small group. That pattern, identifying stated purpose rather than inventing a larger story, transfers to many instruction-following screens.

Work-style questions without profile gaming

Some preparation materials include work-style or preference questions. Those items usually ask how you approach collaboration, incomplete requirements, specialist depth versus breadth, defect reporting and planning style.

Important limits:

• There is no verified public rule that one universal ideal personality profile always wins Epic hiring.
• Trying to invent a fake “perfect engineer” persona often creates inconsistent answers.
• Technical work generally rewards clear communication, careful verification, honest reporting and respect for privacy and process. That is professional guidance, not a scoring key.

Better approach:

• Answer in a way that matches how you actually work when you are careful and professional.
• Prefer consistency across similar themes.
• Avoid extreme answers that do not reflect real judgment under ambiguity or risk.
• Do not treat preference stems as puzzles to reverse-engineer.

Exercises 26 to 30 later on this page are unscored reflections. They have no correct answers and no ideal response ranges. Use them to practice reading preference stems calmly, not to memorize a supposed winning profile.

Interview preparation boundaries

Assessments and interviews are related hiring stages, but they are not the same task. An invitation may include an online reasoning screen, a technical conversation, a behavioral interview or a project discussion. Prepare for the stage you are actually entering.

Healthy interview preparation usually includes:

• reviewing your own project stories with clear problem, action and result structure;
• being ready to explain tradeoffs, testing habits and how you handle incomplete requirements;
• preparing thoughtful questions about the team, role expectations and success measures;
• following any confidentiality or nondisclosure instructions you receive.

Boundaries to respect:

• Do not seek or share confidential Epic interview questions, proprietary source code, customer data or patient information.
• Do not claim that practice scores guarantee an interview outcome.
• Do not treat anonymous online reports as official process rules when they conflict with your invitation.

If your process later includes a separate publisher assessment such as an SHL module, keep the preparation streams distinct and follow the named product instructions.

Privacy and confidentiality

Healthcare software environments handle sensitive information. Candidates should practice privacy-aware habits from the start of the hiring process.

Practical rules:

• Follow every confidentiality instruction in your application materials and assessment platform.
• Do not copy, photograph or redistribute assessment content.
• Do not use real patient data, customer identifiers or proprietary screenshots in any practice notes you create.
• Be careful with public discussion of live hiring content. Educational practice is different from disclosing confidential process material.
• If you are unsure whether a detail is public, treat it as non-public until an official source clarifies it.

The practice questions on this page are intentionally abstract and original. They do not recreate Epic’s product interface or confidential configurations.

How to prepare

A practical plan works better than last-minute cramming, especially when your invitation arrives with limited notice.

Suggested structure for one to two weeks

1. Diagnose: complete a short mixed set covering quantitative, logic, pseudocode, table reading and one reading item. Note weak areas.
2. Drill fundamentals: rates, percentages, ratios, deduction rules, variable tracing and FIFO/LIFO definitions.
3. Mixed practice: switch topics so you rehearse flexible reading, not only one comfortable question type.
4. Work-style calm practice: read preference stems without trying to game them.
5. Review errors: rewrite a one-sentence explanation for every miss until the principle is automatic.

Daily session template (45 to 75 minutes)

• 10 minutes reviewing formulas and logic patterns;
• 25 to 40 minutes answering mixed practice items;
• 10 to 20 minutes writing explanations for misses;
• 5 minutes listing invitation rules to confirm before test day.

What to emphasize

• Accuracy before speed in the first sessions.
• Exact reading of what each stem asks for.
• Clean tracing for pseudocode instead of pattern guessing.
• Consistency in work-style answers.

What not to do

• Do not memorize claimed official section counts that Epic has not published.
• Do not assume every technical role includes coding.
• Do not chase score guarantees from any practice provider.
• Do not replace reading your invitation with reading forum summaries.

Independent practice packs can help with extra timed drills and topic coverage. Confirm package contents and current USD pricing on the provider page before buying. Keep this site’s original 30 exercises as a free educational baseline.

30 practice questions

Work through the exercises below under light time pressure if you want a more realistic rehearsal. Questions 1 to 25 are scored educational items with answers and explanations. Questions 26 to 30 are unscored work-style reflections.

Quantitative and logical reasoning

1. A team completes 42 tasks in 6 days at a constant rate. How many tasks does it complete per day?

A. 6 B. 7 C. 8 D. 9

Correct answer: B

Explanation: 42 divided by 6 equals 7.

2. A processing time falls from 50 minutes to 40 minutes. What is the percentage decrease?

A. 10% B. 20% C. 25% D. 40%

Correct answer: B

Explanation: The decrease is 10 minutes. Ten divided by the original 50 equals 20%.

3. Three servers process 900 requests equally. How many requests does each process?

A. 200 B. 250 C. 300 D. 450

Correct answer: C

Explanation: 900 divided by 3 equals 300.

4. A value increases by 25% from 80. What is the new value?

A. 90 B. 95 C. 100 D. 105

Correct answer: C

Explanation: Twenty-five percent of 80 is 20. The new value is 100.

5. The ratio of resolved to unresolved cases is 7:2. If 18 cases are unresolved, how many are resolved?

A. 49 B. 56 C. 63 D. 72

Correct answer: C

Explanation: Two ratio parts equal 18, so one part equals 9. Seven parts equal 63.

6. A project has four phases lasting 3, 5, 4 and 6 weeks. Two weeks of work overlap between phases. What is the total elapsed time?

A. 16 weeks B. 18 weeks C. 20 weeks D. 22 weeks

Correct answer: A

Explanation: The phase durations total 18 weeks. Subtracting two weeks of overlap gives 16.

7. All validated records are reviewed. Some imported records are validated. Which conclusion must be true?

A. All imported records are reviewed. B. Some imported records are reviewed. C. No imported records are reviewed. D. All reviewed records are imported.

Correct answer: B

Explanation: Some imported records are validated, and every validated record is reviewed. Therefore, some imported records are reviewed.

8. If a warning appears, the event is logged. No event was logged. What follows under the rule?

A. A warning appeared. B. No warning appeared. C. Logging was disabled. D. Nothing can be concluded.

Correct answer: B

Explanation: If every warning produces a log, the absence of a log means no warning appeared under the stated rule.

9. Exactly one of Module A and Module B is active. Module A is inactive. What must be true?

A. Module B is active. B. Module B is inactive. C. Both are inactive. D. Both are active.

Correct answer: A

Explanation: Exactly one must be active. Since A is inactive, B must be active.

10. A occurs before B. C occurs after B. D occurs before C. Which statement must be true?

A. D occurs before A. B. A occurs before C. C. C occurs before B. D. B occurs before A.

Correct answer: B

Explanation: A is before B and B is before C. Therefore, A must be before C.

Pseudocode and technical reasoning

11. Consider:

x = 4
y = x + 3
x = y - 1

What is the final value of x?

A. 4 B. 5 C. 6 D. 7

Correct answer: C

Explanation: y becomes 7, then x becomes 7 - 1, which is 6.

12. Consider:

total = 0
for each value in [2, 5, 3]:
    total = total + value

What is the final total?

A. 8 B. 10 C. 12 D. 15

Correct answer: B

Explanation: 2 + 5 + 3 equals 10.

13. Consider:

count = 0
for each number in [4, 7, 8, 11]:
    if number is even:
        count = count + 1

What is the final count?

A. 1 B. 2 C. 3 D. 4

Correct answer: B

Explanation: The even values are 4 and 8.

14. A function returns true only when both A and B are true. What does it return when A is true and B is false?

A. True B. False C. Null D. The result alternates

Correct answer: B

Explanation: A logical AND requires both conditions to be true.

15. Which data structure is normally best suited to first-in, first-out processing?

A. Queue B. Stack C. Unordered set D. Constant

Correct answer: A

Explanation: A queue removes items in the same order in which they were added.

16. Which data structure normally uses last-in, first-out processing?

A. Queue B. Stack C. Table row D. Boolean

Correct answer: B

Explanation: A stack removes the most recently added item first.

17. A list is [3, 8, 2, 8, 5]. How many values are greater than 4?

A. Two B. Three C. Four D. Five

Correct answer: B

Explanation: The values greater than 4 are 8, 8 and 5.

18. A loop runs once for every item in a list of 12 items. The operation inside the loop runs exactly twice per iteration. How many times does the operation run?

A. 12 B. 14 C. 24 D. 144

Correct answer: C

Explanation: Twelve iterations multiplied by two operations equals 24.

19. Which statement best describes an off-by-one error?

A. Using an index boundary that is one position too high or too low B. Dividing by a negative number C. Sorting text alphabetically D. Encrypting a file twice

Correct answer: A

Explanation: Off-by-one errors commonly occur when loop or array boundaries include or exclude one unintended position.

20. A program must reject an empty required field. Which condition is most relevant?

A. The field length equals zero B. The field contains a vowel C. The field is displayed in blue D. The user has opened another page

Correct answer: A

Explanation: An empty text field has no characters, so its length is zero.

Data interpretation and reading

Use this table:

Month	Requests	Resolved
January	120	108
February	150	132
March	140	126

21. Which month has the highest number of resolved requests?

A. January B. February C. March D. All are equal

Correct answer: B

Explanation: February has 132 resolved requests, the highest value.

22. How many January requests remained unresolved?

A. 8 B. 10 C. 12 D. 18

Correct answer: C

Explanation: 120 - 108 = 12.

23. What percentage of March requests were resolved?

A. 80% B. 85% C. 90% D. 95%

Correct answer: C

Explanation: 126 divided by 140 equals 0.90, or 90%.

24. What is the total number of requests across all three months?

A. 390 B. 400 C. 410 D. 420

Correct answer: C

Explanation: 120 + 150 + 140 = 410.

Read the passage:

A project team plans to introduce a new workflow in stages. The first stage will involve a small user group, and the team will review error reports before expanding access. The staged approach is intended to identify problems early without delaying the entire project indefinitely.

25. What is the main reason for starting with a small group?

A. To avoid collecting feedback B. To identify problems before wider expansion C. To cancel the project D. To prevent any future changes

Correct answer: B

Explanation: The passage states that the team will review error reports before expanding access.

Work-style reflections (unscored)

Exercises 26 to 30 are unscored reflections. They do not have correct answers or ideal response ranges.

26.

A. I prefer to share an early draft so others can influence its direction. B. I prefer to complete a developed first draft before requesting feedback.

Unscored reflection: This compares early collaboration with deeper individual preparation.

27.

A. When requirements are incomplete, I prefer to document assumptions and begin the reversible parts. B. When requirements are incomplete, I prefer to obtain more clarification before beginning.

Unscored reflection: This compares controlled progress with additional verification.

28.

A. I prefer specializing deeply in one system. B. I prefer understanding several connected systems and how they interact.

Unscored reflection: This compares specialist depth with cross-system breadth.

29.

A. When I find a possible defect, I prefer to report it early while investigating. B. When I find a possible defect, I prefer to reproduce and narrow it before reporting.

Unscored reflection: This compares early visibility with a more complete initial report.

30.

A. I prefer a detailed plan with explicit milestones. B. I prefer a clear outcome with flexibility in how the work reaches it.

Unscored reflection: This compares structured planning with adaptive delivery.

Answer key for questions 1 to 25

Question	Correct answer
1	B
2	B
3	C
4	C
5	C
6	A
7	B
8	B
9	A
10	B
11	C
12	B
13	B
14	B
15	A
16	B
17	B
18	C
19	A
20	A
21	B
22	C
23	C
24	C
25	B

Questions 26 to 30 are unscored work-style reflections and are intentionally omitted from the answer key.

FAQ